<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prince Harry To Be Kept Behind Front Line In Iraq</title>
	<link>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/19/prince-harry-to-be-kept-behind-front-line-in-iraq/</link>
	<description>Taking a different one on the news</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: DannyMackay</title>
		<link>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/19/prince-harry-to-be-kept-behind-front-line-in-iraq/#comment-7573</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/19/prince-harry-to-be-kept-behind-front-line-in-iraq/#comment-7573</guid>
					<description>Actually the elections were remarkably free and fair compared to the first elections held in occupied Germany after WW2. 

Of course that says more about German democracy in the late 40s and early 50s than it does about Iraqi democracy in the new millenium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the elections were remarkably free and fair compared to the first elections held in occupied Germany after WW2. </p>
<p>Of course that says more about German democracy in the late 40s and early 50s than it does about Iraqi democracy in the new millenium.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: theo</title>
		<link>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/19/prince-harry-to-be-kept-behind-front-line-in-iraq/#comment-7436</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 21:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/19/prince-harry-to-be-kept-behind-front-line-in-iraq/#comment-7436</guid>
					<description>Yes your right! But only after the nation voted in the rigged elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes your right! But only after the nation voted in the rigged elections.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DannyMackay</title>
		<link>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/19/prince-harry-to-be-kept-behind-front-line-in-iraq/#comment-7190</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/19/prince-harry-to-be-kept-behind-front-line-in-iraq/#comment-7190</guid>
					<description>theo 
ah - but if we can overcoming the problem on technicalities - then technically Iraq is an independent country that has invited UK and US troops to help it establish order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>theo<br />
ah - but if we can overcoming the problem on technicalities - then technically Iraq is an independent country that has invited UK and US troops to help it establish order.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: theo</title>
		<link>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/19/prince-harry-to-be-kept-behind-front-line-in-iraq/#comment-7149</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/19/prince-harry-to-be-kept-behind-front-line-in-iraq/#comment-7149</guid>
					<description>Yes I do believe that the Royals never visited occupied Germany. they visited India for example but that was not a nation in the true sense of the word's modern meaning - the sub continent was a collection of fiefdoms. I cannot recall an occupied country oh hang on maybe Egypt counts here - because they were well established as a nation but we may have got over the embarrassment of occupying her by calling her a Protectorate or some such sophism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I do believe that the Royals never visited occupied Germany. they visited India for example but that was not a nation in the true sense of the word&#8217;s modern meaning - the sub continent was a collection of fiefdoms. I cannot recall an occupied country oh hang on maybe Egypt counts here - because they were well established as a nation but we may have got over the embarrassment of occupying her by calling her a Protectorate or some such sophism.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DannyMackay</title>
		<link>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/19/prince-harry-to-be-kept-behind-front-line-in-iraq/#comment-7103</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/19/prince-harry-to-be-kept-behind-front-line-in-iraq/#comment-7103</guid>
					<description>Theo
Are you sure its a thousand years ago? Surely various royals visited Germany in the late 40s. And that was far more comprehensively occupied than Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theo<br />
Are you sure its a thousand years ago? Surely various royals visited Germany in the late 40s. And that was far more comprehensively occupied than Iraq.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: theo</title>
		<link>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/19/prince-harry-to-be-kept-behind-front-line-in-iraq/#comment-7097</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 07:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/19/prince-harry-to-be-kept-behind-front-line-in-iraq/#comment-7097</guid>
					<description>Third in line , not bad considering his DNA is totally different too! Ding Dong!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Third in line , not bad considering his DNA is totally different too! Ding Dong!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Span Ows</title>
		<link>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/19/prince-harry-to-be-kept-behind-front-line-in-iraq/#comment-6988</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/19/prince-harry-to-be-kept-behind-front-line-in-iraq/#comment-6988</guid>
					<description>Firstly he's 3rd in line after his older brother William and their father Charles, secondly if he was mollycoddled into some safe corner away from his regiment it would play hell on overall moral of our soldiers and probably damage the Monarchy more than merely trying to allow a higher level of security with his regiment, thirdly he will immediately become more of a target because of who he is and so I'm sure all his Household Cavalry colleagues understand any special attention...forthly (!!) the press have instantly made the situation worse...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly he&#8217;s 3rd in line after his older brother William and their father Charles, secondly if he was mollycoddled into some safe corner away from his regiment it would play hell on overall moral of our soldiers and probably damage the Monarchy more than merely trying to allow a higher level of security with his regiment, thirdly he will immediately become more of a target because of who he is and so I&#8217;m sure all his Household Cavalry colleagues understand any special attention&#8230;forthly (!!) the press have instantly made the situation worse&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: theo</title>
		<link>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/19/prince-harry-to-be-kept-behind-front-line-in-iraq/#comment-6980</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/19/prince-harry-to-be-kept-behind-front-line-in-iraq/#comment-6980</guid>
					<description>The fact that the second in line to the throne would be present in an occupied country makes a statement of overwhelming arrogance to the occupied population - the last time a potential heir was on occupied land must have been over a 1000 years ago plus. And what if like Richard &quot;cour de lion&quot; Plantaganet he is kidnapped or worse killed? As a young man working in the army he may have an image problem' if he is coddled and kept away from action, amongst his peers but the British people are massively against the war in Iraq. What of Afghanistan ? Nato are supported by legal process of the U.N and there is a strong legal international presence. He should serve there where the vile  elements of the Taliban  can be confronted on a wholly unquestionable moral front.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that the second in line to the throne would be present in an occupied country makes a statement of overwhelming arrogance to the occupied population - the last time a potential heir was on occupied land must have been over a 1000 years ago plus. And what if like Richard &#8220;cour de lion&#8221; Plantaganet he is kidnapped or worse killed? As a young man working in the army he may have an image problem&#8217; if he is coddled and kept away from action, amongst his peers but the British people are massively against the war in Iraq. What of Afghanistan ? Nato are supported by legal process of the U.N and there is a strong legal international presence. He should serve there where the vile  elements of the Taliban  can be confronted on a wholly unquestionable moral front.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

