<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freedom Of Information Act Scuppered By Own Success</title>
	<link>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/08/freedom-of-information-act-scuppered-by-own-success/</link>
	<description>Taking a different one on the news</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: DannyMackay</title>
		<link>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/08/freedom-of-information-act-scuppered-by-own-success/#comment-6246</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 13:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/08/freedom-of-information-act-scuppered-by-own-success/#comment-6246</guid>
					<description>guys 
I quite like most of whats written on this site - though granted in general i fall prey to the old addage that the satisfied stay silent, and thus don't comment on most articles. 

Then everynow and then I read something that gets up my nose - one example being the TB Legacy article - which did that annoying and oh so common thing of saying labour and tories are the same – so I commented. I didn’t agree with the person who said the article looked like a Daily Mail rant – it was in fact a funny and interesting article that got up my nose (no bad thing).

Then having taken a quick look on there to see any of the comments other people put – I read this – and it was so horribly close to a tabloid rant that I felt compelled to criticise it. 

The exaggeration – the absolute nature of the negative – the dark imagery – the cartoon stereotypes - the writer adopting the position as spokesman for the people – 

So I did what you invite people to do – and commented. 

I tried to do it in a mocking way – since I like the tone. 

ps - i don't like the new legislation - but that doesn't mean i like every article that criticises it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guys<br />
I quite like most of whats written on this site - though granted in general i fall prey to the old addage that the satisfied stay silent, and thus don&#8217;t comment on most articles. </p>
<p>Then everynow and then I read something that gets up my nose - one example being the TB Legacy article - which did that annoying and oh so common thing of saying labour and tories are the same – so I commented. I didn’t agree with the person who said the article looked like a Daily Mail rant – it was in fact a funny and interesting article that got up my nose (no bad thing).</p>
<p>Then having taken a quick look on there to see any of the comments other people put – I read this – and it was so horribly close to a tabloid rant that I felt compelled to criticise it. </p>
<p>The exaggeration – the absolute nature of the negative – the dark imagery – the cartoon stereotypes - the writer adopting the position as spokesman for the people – </p>
<p>So I did what you invite people to do – and commented. </p>
<p>I tried to do it in a mocking way – since I like the tone. </p>
<p>ps - i don&#8217;t like the new legislation - but that doesn&#8217;t mean i like every article that criticises it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Simon Kimber</title>
		<link>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/08/freedom-of-information-act-scuppered-by-own-success/#comment-6243</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 12:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/08/freedom-of-information-act-scuppered-by-own-success/#comment-6243</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;How dare they bring in a Freedom of Information Act! How dare they massively increase scrutiny of the public sector as a whole!&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Danny,  I'm not quite sure where you're coming from with this. You seem to be implying that the writer is saying the FoI act is a bad thing when to me he seems firmly in favour of it and is concerned about the losing that scrutiny!  I don't get it.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;I’ll call the era of greatest democratic scrutiny in history a “dark age”&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Surely you have to concede that you're twisting what was said a bit there?  Also the term was &quot;dark times&quot;, not a &quot;dark age&quot;, which I read as a reference to the public being kept in the dark on certain issues - the government's refusal to disclose the letters between John Reid and the police recently, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;How dare they bring in a Freedom of Information Act! How dare they massively increase scrutiny of the public sector as a whole!&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Danny,  I&#8217;m not quite sure where you&#8217;re coming from with this. You seem to be implying that the writer is saying the FoI act is a bad thing when to me he seems firmly in favour of it and is concerned about the losing that scrutiny!  I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;I’ll call the era of greatest democratic scrutiny in history a “dark age”&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Surely you have to concede that you&#8217;re twisting what was said a bit there?  Also the term was &#8220;dark times&#8221;, not a &#8220;dark age&#8221;, which I read as a reference to the public being kept in the dark on certain issues - the government&#8217;s refusal to disclose the letters between John Reid and the police recently, for example.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rhys Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/08/freedom-of-information-act-scuppered-by-own-success/#comment-6240</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 12:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/08/freedom-of-information-act-scuppered-by-own-success/#comment-6240</guid>
					<description>Riiiight! So is your rant a satirical critisism of my non-satirical article or an ironic, self-aware comment teetering on the edge of misunderstanding?

What are your thoughts on the actual bill? You seem more interested in my (in)ability to formulate a narrative rather than the issue itself.

This 'small legal ammendment' could be enough smallprint to negate the effectiveness of the Act forever. This doesn't bother you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Riiiight! So is your rant a satirical critisism of my non-satirical article or an ironic, self-aware comment teetering on the edge of misunderstanding?</p>
<p>What are your thoughts on the actual bill? You seem more interested in my (in)ability to formulate a narrative rather than the issue itself.</p>
<p>This &#8217;small legal ammendment&#8217; could be enough smallprint to negate the effectiveness of the Act forever. This doesn&#8217;t bother you?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DannyMackay</title>
		<link>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/08/freedom-of-information-act-scuppered-by-own-success/#comment-6239</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 12:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.theslant.co.uk/2007/02/08/freedom-of-information-act-scuppered-by-own-success/#comment-6239</guid>
					<description>naughty dictators! How dare they bring in a Freedom of Information Act! How dare they massively increase scrutiny of the public sector as a whole! I want to rant... 

Right, how can I satirise this? 

I know - I'll call the era of greatest democratic scrutiny in history a &quot;dark age&quot; - ooo and I can label MPs childish - ah and how about I exagerate a small legal ammendment as a bill to end democracy... 

yeah - that'll do. 

Evil evil dictators! 

(in case its not clear - I'm not convinced silly comparisons make a rant into satire.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>naughty dictators! How dare they bring in a Freedom of Information Act! How dare they massively increase scrutiny of the public sector as a whole! I want to rant&#8230; </p>
<p>Right, how can I satirise this? </p>
<p>I know - I&#8217;ll call the era of greatest democratic scrutiny in history a &#8220;dark age&#8221; - ooo and I can label MPs childish - ah and how about I exagerate a small legal ammendment as a bill to end democracy&#8230; </p>
<p>yeah - that&#8217;ll do. </p>
<p>Evil evil dictators! </p>
<p>(in case its not clear - I&#8217;m not convinced silly comparisons make a rant into satire.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
